Chart-Summary of Gordon Wayne Watts' filings in the Richard Daniggelis “mortgage fraud” case.
“CH” refers to Chancery Division Case #: 2007-CH-29738 (GMAC Mortgage LLC, et al. v. Richard Daniggelis, et al.)
“M1” refers to Civil Division Case #: 2014-M1-701473 (Joseph Younes v. Richard Daniggelis)
“LAW” refers to Law Division Case #: 2007-CH-29738 (GMAC Mortgage LLC, et al. v. Richard Daniggelis, et al.)
“CH-Appeal” refers to GMAC v. Daniggelis, NO. 1-14-2751, before the 1st Appellate court, appealing 2007-CH-29738.
“M1-Appeal” refers to Younes v. Daniggelis, NO. 1-15-0662, before 1st Appellate court, appealing 2014-M1-701473.
-X- |
Aug. 03, 2015 filings -dated as “8/10/2015” on both court dockets for some odd reason... ;-p .. ? .. Α α |
||
CH |
Affidavit |
Notice of Motion |
MotionForAmicus/Amicus/Exhibits |
M1 |
Affidavit |
Notice of Motion |
MotionForAmicus/Amicus/Exhibits |
-X- |
Aug. 16, 2015 filings -dated “08/21/2015” on CH docket, and filed under Galic's name, making it appear that they had been lost: M1/Civil Division, however, really did lose my filings ;-p )-; not on docket! ;-( – I had to re-send them... (see below) Β β |
||
CH |
Notice of Motion |
Motion to Supplement + Exhibits |
Proposed Order |
M1 |
Notice of Motion |
Motion to Supplement + Exhibits |
Proposed Order |
CH-Appeal |
Motions: Waiver of Fees, Amicus, Supplement the Record on Appeal |
“Supporting Record” |
Proposed Order |
M1-Appeal |
Motions: Waiver of Fees, Amicus, Supplement the Record on Appeal |
“Supporting Record” |
Proposed Order |
-X- |
Sept. 08 / 09 / 10, 2015 this time, CH lost my filings: Not on docket!... ;-( .. LOL Γ γ |
||||||
CH |
“Judicial Notice...” (e.g., new key findings) |
Proposed Order (Chancery lost these! –I had to re-file them..) |
|||||
M1 |
“Judicial Notice...” (e.g., new key findings) |
Proposed Order |
I re-sent the stuff that M1/Civil lost: Finally, it appears on docket, dated: “9/11/2015.” |
||||
LAW |
Affidavit |
Notice of Motion |
MotionForAmicus/Amicus/Exhibits Dated '9/14/2015' on court's docket |
“Judicial Notice...” (e.g., new key findings) |
Proposed Order |
-X- |
Sept. 23, 2015 (Judge didn't allow me to appear telephonically, so I gave 'notice of motion' a 2nd time!) NOTE: For some reason, Law Division docket doesn't show these filings: Court lost them – again! ;-( Δ δ |
|
LAW |
Notice of Motion |
Proposed Order |
Note: Looking at the Law Division docket, it would appear that, on 11/16/2015, an order was entered against me, and speaking with the clerks, they confirm this. However, I wasn't provided with a copy of the Order against me! Where is my Due Process? What if I want to appeal it – how can I do that without a copy of the Order... :-( ... LOL
-X- |
Oct. 02, 2015 Letter to Judges (letters are similar, but not identical) I inform judges that many of my motions appear on docket but are ignored by judges & not ruled upon, thus denying me Due Process: Yes, I sent a letter directly to the judges, rather uncommon & usually forbidden ex parte communication. Ε ε |
CH |
Letter (Shown as “INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE FILED” 7 dated 10/29/2015 on Chancery docket – took awhile!) – 'Usually' forbidden, but not in certain circumstances: see letters for details... |
M1 |
Letter – My filings were lost again: CIVIL DIVISION didn't even docket or rule on this! :-( |
LAW |
Letter – My filings were lost again: LAW DIVISION didn't even docket or rule on this! :-( |
-X- |
Nov. 30, 2015 (I filed motion for rehearing of CH Div. order by Judge Otto, denying various motions.) Ζ ζ |
CH |
Motion for Rehearing with requisite 'Notice of Motion' (In transit w/ USPS tracking: not yet on docket.) |
For updated information, see front-page news of The Register: www.GordonWatts.com / www.GordonWayneWatts.com