Atty. Greggio:
Here is my response: it is the PDF attachment, titled:
"IARDC-reply-of-GordonWayneWatts.pdf" -- It is a signed original, with a scanned
image of my physical signature, if that would be needed. Furthermore, I am
available by telephone (main: 863-688-9880 or alternate 863-409-2109) should you
need to depose me or obtain a taped statement, and, now that Mr. Richard B.
Daniggelis (now homeless, due to this mortgage fraud) has learned how to use his
voice mail, you might call him at 312-774-4742, and get a statement from him on
this head.
The other five attachments are supporting documents (for a total
of six (6) attachments in my reply). While they may "look familiar,"
please be advised that some, if not all, of them are more updated versions of
that which I have already submitted to you.
Other than a pull of the record from the courthouse (which would be needed
to verify my claims that my own exhibits are authentic - and not themselves
forgeries - as I allege with regard to others), you may rely fully upon the
supporting docs in this email attachment. **However** -- while I,
myself, know the exhibits in my filings are authentic, nonetheless, it
would be necessary to compare the exhibits in my own filings with those official
filings already "on record" in the four (4) cases referenced in this matter,
the 2004 Deutch Bank case, the two "2007-CH-29738" cases (one in
Chancery and one in LAW, but with identical case numbers), and, of course,
the 2014 case in the Civil Division. Then, you can see things like the 2
Warranty Deeds with **identical** signatures - one of the issues I raise, and
for which anyone has yet to receive an explanation from the key players.
There were a few new turns of events that might partially or fully
exonerate Mr. Shelton, thus possibly making Mr. Younes the "likely suspect," but
this investigation is still early - just a heads up on the new twists &
turns. -- please find enclosed my replies.
PS: In other conversations, Atty. King was kind enough to authorise me to
represent to the court that he would consent to electronic (email) service in
regards to the ongoing court cases; I'm not sure if that applies here, and
none of the other participants made such representations. (I do,
however, intend to serve all parties hard copies - "just to be on the safe
side" - if I am able.)
Gordon W. Watts
In a message dated 8/17/2015 5:42:25 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
RGreggio@iardc.org
<Atty. Rita C. Greggio, Esq.> writes:
Mr. Watts,
Am the attorney investigating your grievances against
attorneys Younes and Shelton.
I attempted calling you at the numbers listed on your
website but was unable to reach you. I’d like to discuss your request
for investigation with you. Can you please call me at 312-540-5209, at
your convenience, to discuss these matters? I am in the office Monday-Friday
from 9:30 a.m. to 5:50 p.m. (central time zone).
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
Sincerely,
Rita
C. Greggio
Litigation
Counsel
Attorney
Registration & Disciplinary Commission
130
E. Randolph Dr., Suite 1500
Chicago,
IL 60601
Telephone:
312.540.5209
rgreggio@iardc.org