ANGELS ON ASSIGNMENT
A Paper From Melodyland School of Theology
J. Rodman Williams, Former President
Due to the widespread expression of concern about the book Angels on Assignment, by the late Pastor Roland Buck, a group of five persons recently covened at Melodyland School of Theology for serious consideration. Not only was the book available but also several tapes and interviews of the late pastor Buck. As a result of the deliberation the five personsthree professors and two regents of the School of Theologyfelt it important to make some public declaration concerning the matter. The paper that follows is a result of this deliberation.
The paper is in two parts: Part Onea series of biblical affirmations, warnings, and tests in relation to visitation of angels. This part, closing with an expression of concern, intends to be a biblical statement against which any visitations might be weighed and evaluated.
This first part is fundamental because we live in an era when for many, experience is paramount. Therefore, the view that if an experience is real, it must be right often predominates. We must, however, acknowledge that Scripture is the final authority and thereby judge all experiencesnot the reverse. For while Scripture and experience go hand in hand, the former is the means by which we test the latter.
Part Two will deal specifically with Pastor Buck's book. Since it is more readily available than the tapes and interviews, quotations (except in one case) will be taken therefrom. The procedure will be that of setting down the tests, found in Part One, and under each heading listing relevant quotations. Pastor Buck will be quoted in context and the Scriptures allowed to speak. It is hoped that this presentation will assist interested Christians in seeing that there is severe doubt as to who assigned Pastor Buck's angels.
I. We affirm the reality of angels
There is ample biblical testimony to their activityboth Old and New Testament.
We do not number ourselves among the Sadducees, past or present, who "say that there is nor resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit" (Acts 23:8).
II. We affirm that angels may be experienced
Experiences with angels are recorded a number of times in the Old and New Testaments by many men and women of GodAbraham, Jacob, Moses, Gideon, Ezekiel, Daniel, and many others in the Old Testament. In the New Testament, e.g., Zechariah, Mary, Joseph, Jesus Himself, shepherds, women at the tomb, apostles at the ascension, Peter, Philip, Cornelius, Paul, John.
Biblical assurance is also given of angels' continuing activity and presence. Examples:
Ps. 34:7* "The angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear him, and delivers them." Ps. 91:11-12 "For he will give his angels charge of you to guard you in all your ways. On their hands they will bear you up lest you dash your foot against a stone." Mt. 18:10 "See that you do not despise one of these little ones; for I tell you that in heaven their angels always behold the face of my Father who is in heaven." Heb. 1:14 "Are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to serve, for the sake of those who are to obtain salvation?" Heb. 12:22 "But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering " Heb. 13:2 "Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares." *All quotations, unless otherwise noted, are taken from the Revised Standard Version. Contemporary experiences of angels has ample biblical basewhether such experience is recognized or unrecognized.
Billy Graham: "Angels, whether noticed by men or not are active in our twentieth-century world. Are we aware of them?" (Angels: God's Secret Agents, p. 168)
III. We affirm the following:
A. Angels are largely anonymous. (Note the biblical hesitancy about angel's name: "Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?" Jdg. 13:18)
- An "angel"
- "An angel of the Lord"
- "Angels of God", etc.
- Michael and Gabriel are named (but only in reference to extraordinary tasks in the process of biblical revelation: Daniel 8-10, 12; Lk. 1; Jude 9; Rev. 12)
Any other names go beyond biblical record.
B. Angels are little described.
- Neither male nor femaleMk. 12:25
- May appear in the form of a mane.g., Gen. 19:1; Jdg. 12:6; Mk. 16:5
- May appear in "dazzling apparel" (or white)e.g., Lk. 24:4; Acts 1:10
- Nothing regarding age, size, other dress, etc.
Any other descriptions go beyond biblical record.
IV. We affirm the specific roles of angels to be the following:
A. Praising and worshipping God.
Ps. 103:20 "Bless the Lord, O you his angels " Ps. 148:2 "Praise him, all his angels ." Heb. 1:6 "Let all God's angels worship him." Rev. 5:11-12 " the voice of many angels, numbering myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands, saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb " B. Announcing extraordinary events in biblical history.
- e.g., Birth of Isaac and Destruction of SodomGenesis 18
- The call to GideonJudges 6
- The Birth of Jesus ChristLk. 1 & 2
- The resurrection of Jesusall Gospels
- The return in gloryActs 1
C. Interpreting Divine Visions in biblical revelation.
- e.g., Daniel's visionsDaniel 8 & 9
- Zechariah's visionZech. 1
- John's visionsfrequently in the book of Revelation
D. Consoling, strengthening, protecting, delivering.
- e.g., ConsolationGen. 16:9-11
- StrengthI Kgs. 19:5; Mt. 4:11; Lk. 22:43
- ProtectionEx. 14:19; 23:20; Ps. 34:7; 91:11; Mt. 18:20
- DeliveranceNum. 20:16; Dan. 6:22; Acts 5:19; 12:7
E. Giving simple directions to fulfill God's purpose.
- e.g., to Elijah"Arise, go up to meet the messengers of the king " 2 Kgs. 1:3
- to the Apostles"Go and stand in the temple and speak " Acts 5:19
- to Philip"Rise, go to the south " Acts 8:26
- to Cornelius"Send men to Joppa " Acts 10:5
- to Paul"Do not be afraid Paul; you must stand before Caesar " Acts 27:23
F. Executing judgment
- e.g., upon Israel2 Sam. 24:16; 1 Chr. 21:14
- Upon Israel's foes2 Kgs. 19:35; Isa. 37:36
- Upon King HerodActs 12:23
- Upon evil at largeMt. 13:41; 2 Th. 1:7; Rev. 8:7-12 (and elsewhere)
Any other roles of angels are not in accordance with the Scriptures.
V. We set forth the following biblical warnings regarding angelic visitations:
VI. We set forth a number of tests for visitations (in accordance with I John 4:1"Test the spirits" and I Thessalonians 5:21"Test everything").
A. An angel is to be accursed if he proclaims an "other" gospel.
- Gal 1: 8 "But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary [or "other than," "more than"] let him be accursed."
B. An "angel of light" may be Satan in disguise.
- "And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light"this Satan is like false apostles who disguise themselves as apostles of Christ (1:13).
C. An angel (by nature a "spirit") is not to be believed simply because he is a spirit.
- I John 4:1 "Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are of God "
D. An angel may, therefore, be a "deceitful spirit."
- I Tim. 4:1 "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from [fall away from] the faith by giving heed to deceitful [or 'seducing' KJVor 'misleading'] spirits "
Test IAre there angels identified by non-biblical names?
Test IIAre the angels given extra-biblical description?
Test IIIAre they performing roles beyond the biblical picture?
Test IVAre they sources of additional information beyond biblical confirmation"
Test VAre they in any way proclaiming an "other" gospel?
If the answer is yes to any of these five, they fail the test of being angels of God.
VII. We are greatly concerned about the following:
A. Failure of discernmentthough the supernaturally good is being multiplied in our time, the evil is likewise rapidly accelerating. B. The possibility of the development of a "religion of the angels." Note the warning in Colossians 2:18"Do not let anyone who delights in false humility and the religion [or 'religion'threskeiacf. Acts 26:5; James 1:27] of angels disqualify you for the prize. Such a person goes into great detail about what he has seen and his unspiritual mind puffs him up with idle notions. He has lost connection with the Head " (New International Version). C. The danger of presumed additional revelation being given through angelic visitation. The Christian faith was "once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3).
Test I (related to III. A. above)
Are there angels identified by non-biblical names?
Answer: |
Whereas two of the late Pastor Buck's visitors identify themselves as Michael and Gabriel, two others, not named in the Bible, are identified as Chrioni and Cyprion.
|
Test II (related to III.B. above)
Are the angels given extra-biblical description?
Answer: |
Whereas some of Pastor Buck's descriptions tally with the Bible, he clearly goes beyond it.
|
Test III (related to IV.A. through F. above)
Are the angels performing roles beyond the biblical picture?
Answer: |
Whereas some of Pastor Buck's descriptions tally with biblical roles, his reporting goes far beyond the Bible.
|
Test IV
Are the angels sources of additional information beyond biblical confirmation?
Answer: |
Although Pastor Buck claimed that the angels only gave scriptural information (e.g., "biblical facts by angelic messengers" [133]), as a matter of fact they frequently gave more than the Bible contains. "Part of the special work God is doing is a broader revelation of himself through the messages brought by angelic visitation" (9--Preface: "A Word from the Wife of Roland Buck"). "Revelations (note the plural) are being brought forth fresh truths from God's Word" (13-14). "After these glorious revelations, difficult truths become simple" (38). Examples of additional information ("broader revelation," "fresh truths," etc.) have already been indirectly noted under the headings of (Test I) non-biblical names, (Test II) extra-biblical description, and (Test III) beyond biblical activities. A few additional examples may now be noted.
|
Test V
Are the angels in any way proclaiming an "other" Gospel?
Answer: |
Pastor Buck's angels frequently went beyond the gospel in the sense of proclaiming as "truths" things more than or other than Scriptural teaching. This doubtless has become apparent in many of the matters discussed under Tests I through IV. This will be noted along with additional examples.
|
WARNINGS
In light of the five tests the four biblical warnings (V. A.-D.) seem all the more significant:
A. | An angel is to be accursed if he proclaims an "other" gospel. Many examples have been noted in Pastor Buck's book of angelic messages, either going beyond or contrary to the Gospel and the biblical record. (Refer back to Test V, all ten paragraphs.) To be sure the angelic messages often contained elements of truth, but over and over again foreign matters were declared. What shall we say, then, according to Paul, about such an angel (or angels)? |
B. | An "angel of light" may be Satan in disguise. Pastor Buck's angelic visitors often appeared in brilliant manner. "There was such a radiation of divine power which comes from them dwelling in the brightness of God's presence, that I could not stand up" (39). Again, "there suddenly appeared a bluish shaft of pure light about eighteen inches in diameter from the ceiling to the floor. The instant the light appeared both angels fell prostrate on the floor" (42). Again, " their entire clothing was radiant, with an iridescent glow" (45). Still again, "It is virtually impossible to describe the radiation and the glow that came from their presence" (166). All such descriptions doubtless could apply to angels of God (such as appeared in "dazzling apparel" at the Resurrection), but there is no assurance that such an appearance may not come from another source. The "bluish shaft of pure light" before which the angels fell prostrate: what guarantee is there that this is the Lord? We must constantly bear in mind the words of Paul: "Satan disguises himself as an angel of light." Pastor Buck claims that Gabriel said on one occasion: "Satan is aware of the fact that God is doing something in Boise, and he has sent princes of darkness to this area in an endeavor to hurt and rob people. . . " (165). Is it possible that some of the visitors to Pastor Buck were "princes of darkness" in disguise, and that many of the messages, while outwardly seeming so beautiful and benign, really do hurt and rob people in Boise and elsewhere? Surely, we have noted many examples of pleasing (though unscriptural) messages such as: home and family ties are eternal; we are "doors" and have the same kind of authority as angels: there is a second chance for some after death; sin has been burned to cinders; and so on. These kinds of messageand many otherswhile pleasant and soothing, are contrary to God's Word. If God is genuinely "doing something in Boise," there is all the more reason that "princes of darkness," masquerading as "angels of light" would appear on the scene. In any event, both in their outward appearance and many of their words spoken, Pastor Buck's visitors could have been Satan's disguises. |
C. | An angel (by nature a "spirit") is not to be believed simply because he is a spirit. We are told by John to "test the spirits." Pastor Buck, however, expresses no desire or intention to make such a check. For example, "I didn't ask the angel to identify himself, or give any credentials"(29). Again, " when God has sent someone on assignment to represent him, you don't question them" (153). Again, "Well, if what the angels told me is true (and who would doubt angels?) " (154). No attempt to identify, no questions, no doubtingall this is contrary to God's Word (for example, the words of Joshua to an angel"commander of the army of the Lord"standing before him: "are you for us, or for our adversaries?" [Josh. 5:13-14]), and can open a wide field for satanic operations. Pastor Buck's attitude represents a far too prevalent mood in our time where many are being carried away, and even destroyed, by naively assuming that if it is supernatural it is of God. But this is not necessarily the case. According to Scripture we are to "test everything; hold fast what is good" (I Thess. 5:21). The good is always in accord with God's Word. |
D. |
An angel may, therefore, be a "deceitful spirit." Is it possible that Pastor Buck has been "giving heed to deceitful [or 'misleading'] spirits" and thus "departing ['falling away'] from the faith"? "Deceitful spirits" are not to be thought of as obvious spirits of evil such as tempt to disobedience or immorality. "Deceitful spirits" are those who outwardly are of God, even presume to declare his truth and his will, but so subtly distort the message that the hearer scarcely knows what is happening until he has fallen away. The matter of deceit, in a different context, could be involved in another experience reported by Pastor Buck. He claimed to have brought a paper back from "God's Throne Room," on which God himself had written down 120 events soon to happen (52). Pastor Buck laid it on his study desk but by morning the paper had turned to ashes so that no one could read it. Pastor Buck said that several pastors who came to see this phenomenon picked up some of the ashes only to have them "evaporate right off their hands as they held them. In two-and-a-half weeks there was not even one speck of dust left!" (60). Such a story (incidentally, not unlike that of Joseph Smith and the "Golden Plates" in Mormonism) hardly rings with credibility. Could this not be another example of "deceitful spirits" at work? |
FINAL CONCERNS
Three concerns were noted at the close of Part One. Further elaboration may now be given.
A. | Failure of discernment. We need more than ever in these critical days, when both good and evil are bring multiplied, to have spiritual discernment. We affirm again the reality of angels, also the possibility of their visitation, and believe that such may occur to any of God'' people. But because all this has to do with the supernatural realm of spirits (whether "ministering" or deceiving"), we must be all the more careful to "test the spirits." This is not to be done in a spirit of disbelief or doubt but through spiritual discernment that is grounded in God's revealed truth in the Scriptures. The danger is that Christian people will allow a spiritual experience, especially a spectacular kind, to so dominate them that, while paying lip service to Scripture, the experience itself becomes the arbiter of truth. An experience of angelswhether good, evil, or illusory (for that matter)is by its very nature so extraordinary as easily to overwhelm ordinary judgments and subtly to replace the authority of the Scriptures. If Pastor Buck, who undoubtedly had extraordinary experiences, had begun early to test the spirits, he would not have so readily been misled, and, even worse, become involved in misleading countless others. |
B. |
The danger of presumed additional revelation being given through angelic visitation. It has been noted in some detail that Pastor Buck's angelic visitors are given extra-biblical description; some have names not mentioned in the Bible; they often perform roles beyond the Bible; and in many cases, they proclaim an "other" gospel. All this means, in varying degree, that revealed truth in the Bible is by no means definitive or normative. Pastor Buck's early claim, "I have not added to, or taken away from the Word of God" (13) simply cannot be sustained. The angels seem little concerned about the Scriptures, many times going beyond the Word of God. Pastor Buck at one point says: "It might be of interest to you to know that during the two to four hours they have stayed each time they have come, there has not been one verse of Scripture quoted" (15). This statement only reinforces our questioning of the angels' messages (despite Pastor Buck's further word that "not once did they leave without giving me Bible references where the message could be found" [157]). For by Pastor Buck's own admission "broader revelation" and "fresh truths" are being given by the angels in our day. All of this is a very serious matter. Since the angelic visitors are presumed to speak infallibly ("who would doubt angels?"), then through them we have infallible truth in addition to Scripture. Pastor Buck's messages from angels have at least equal importance with the Scripturesperhaps more importance since they are allegedly direct from heaven and quite contemporary. From now on therefore we need to read both the Bible and Angels on Assignment to have the full truth! All this smacks too much of Joseph Smith and his revelations [is it pure coincidence that the name of Smith's angel Moroni and Buck's angel Chrioni even sound alike?] which form a separate and even more authoritative volume than the Bible. It makes us want to sound forth a loud alarm of warning: stop before it is too late! |
C. |
The possibility of a "religion of the angels" being developed. One of the greatest dangers in Pastor Buck's book, and the recounting of his experiences, is in the growth of a religion, or cult, focusing on angels. There is far more growth of a religion, or cult, focusing on angels. There is far more mention in his book of angels than of Christ and the Holy Spirit: angels are the active agents in all that transpires. It has been noted that the angels are said to be directly involved in bringing people to salvation; the Holy Spirit (who, according to Scriptures, is Himself the immediate agent) is only in the background "monitoring" their activities. Christ scarcely figures as a living person. Gabriel does say: "Do not seek angels. Seek Jesus!" (16), and reference is made to Christ's atonement, but the sense of his being active, alive, and present is almost totally missing. Angels dominate everything. It becomes far more interesting to discover new things about them, new truths from them, even to delight in their visits, than to keep one's focus on Christ. Paul warns, as we have earlier noted, about the person who, in relation to angels, "goes into great detail about what he has seen and his unspiritual mind puffs him up with idle notions. He has lost connection with the Head " It is to be feared that Pastor Buck has come close to fitting this picture. If so, we would earnestly call his promoters and followers back before it is too late. Otherwise, we may well be in the first stages of the development of a new cult, the cult, or religion, of angels. In the wake of Pastor Buck's sudden death (November 6, 1979) we may anticipate even more "revelations" based upon his lectures and tapes in an attempt to validate Angels on Assignment. The Christian public should be wary of any such extra-biblical utterances and test them by the Word of God. |
A closing word: Pastor Buck's book dramatically shows the need for firmer doctrinal understanding. At one point, in the midst of a conversation with Michael, and under Michael's influence, Pastor Buck says: "When God brings truth, we have to forget our little boxes of doctrine, for God can DO what he wants, and KNOWS what he wants to do" (167). The critical danger here is that by forgetting our doctrineeven "our little boxes"we may fall prey to all kinds of false doctrine: who knows, even "the doctrine of demons" (see again I Tim. 4:1). Pastor Buck's "angels" who neither emphasize Scripture nor are much concerned about doctrine once again prove to be misleading spirits. It is fervently to be hoped that sound doctrine may again become a far more serious matter.
Copyright ©1997 by J. Rodman Williams, Ph.D.